Comments on: Checksums again, some I/O too http://dom.as/2009/05/28/checksums-again-some-io-too/ Sat, 17 Dec 2011 20:14:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: On binaries and -fomit-frame-pointer « domas mituzas: vaporware, inc. http://dom.as/2009/05/28/checksums-again-some-io-too/#comment-1600 Sun, 26 Jul 2009 21:16:20 +0000 http://dammit.lt/?p=502#comment-1600 [...] if you don’t attempt to be power-user. It does, if you enjoy crazy debugger tricks (like one here or here). Oh, and of course, bonus GDB trick, how to run KILL without connecting to [...]

]]> By: Domas Mituzas http://dom.as/2009/05/28/checksums-again-some-io-too/#comment-1599 Tue, 09 Jun 2009 13:00:36 +0000 http://dammit.lt/?p=502#comment-1599 Um, it is single ASM instruction, I don’t have code yet though :)

]]> By: Mark Callaghan http://dom.as/2009/05/28/checksums-again-some-io-too/#comment-1598 Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:21:09 +0000 http://dammit.lt/?p=502#comment-1598 Do you have code to compute crc32 on nehalem using native instructions?

]]>