http://dom.as/2009/11/11/a-formal-objection-to-formal-objection/ Sat, 17 Dec 2011 20:14:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://dom.as/2009/11/11/a-formal-objection-to-formal-objection/#comment-1693 Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:35:00 +0000 http://mituzas.lt/?p=639#comment-1693 4.0.forever :D

]]> http://dom.as/2009/11/11/a-formal-objection-to-formal-objection/#comment-1692 Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:21:44 +0000 http://mituzas.lt/?p=639#comment-1692 Do you mean 4.0.40 ? :)

]]> http://dom.as/2009/11/11/a-formal-objection-to-formal-objection/#comment-1691 Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:09:15 +0000 http://mituzas.lt/?p=639#comment-1691 Some 4.0 can be way more modern than your average 5.0… :) And still, there’s always a 5.1 slave around :)

]]> http://dom.as/2009/11/11/a-formal-objection-to-formal-objection/#comment-1690 Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:26:12 +0000 http://mituzas.lt/?p=639#comment-1690 You don’t mention the other kind of lock-in — excessive admiration of old MySQL release by DBA lock-in. Some people have becomely oddly fond of MySQL 4.0.

]]>