<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: on primary keys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dom.as/2010/07/30/on-primary-keys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dom.as/2010/07/30/on-primary-keys/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 20:14:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domas Mituzas</title>
		<link>http://dom.as/2010/07/30/on-primary-keys/#comment-1767</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Domas Mituzas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 05:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mituzas.lt/?p=774#comment-1767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awesome. Thanks, James, for driving this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome. Thanks, James, for driving this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Day</title>
		<link>http://dom.as/2010/07/30/on-primary-keys/#comment-1766</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Day]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mituzas.lt/?p=774#comment-1766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 17 August patch for this uses the primary key when there&#039;s both a PK and all column secondary index. Expected to be in 5.1.51, just missed the cut off date for 5.1.50. Subject to change, as usual, until it&#039;s actually shipped. For anyone who&#039;s comfortable building the server this is an easy patch to apply.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 17 August patch for this uses the primary key when there&#8217;s both a PK and all column secondary index. Expected to be in 5.1.51, just missed the cut off date for 5.1.50. Subject to change, as usual, until it&#8217;s actually shipped. For anyone who&#8217;s comfortable building the server this is an easy patch to apply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davi Arnaut</title>
		<link>http://dom.as/2010/07/30/on-primary-keys/#comment-1765</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davi Arnaut]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mituzas.lt/?p=774#comment-1765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you probably know, but reiterating again, we accept contributions. We already accepted a few contributions from MariaDB engineers. Likewise for reversals.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you probably know, but reiterating again, we accept contributions. We already accepted a few contributions from MariaDB engineers. Likewise for reversals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrik Ingo</title>
		<link>http://dom.as/2010/07/30/on-primary-keys/#comment-1764</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Henrik Ingo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mituzas.lt/?p=774#comment-1764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;If only upstream MySQL would take note ;-) &lt;/em&gt;

Actually, if Oracle has imposed the same clean-room rules on MySQL as they would for their own engineers, I&#039;m not sure MySQL devs are allowed to look at MariaDB code or changelog. For this one, yes, it is not copyrightable &quot;IPR&quot; that we excluded a patch, but if you look at the adjacent one, they probably are not allowed to look at Igor&#039;s optimization and copy it.

Now, if we only could co-operate with them for real then I wouldn&#039;t be speculating about this in the first place....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>If only upstream MySQL would take note ;-) </em></p>
<p>Actually, if Oracle has imposed the same clean-room rules on MySQL as they would for their own engineers, I&#8217;m not sure MySQL devs are allowed to look at MariaDB code or changelog. For this one, yes, it is not copyrightable &#8220;IPR&#8221; that we excluded a patch, but if you look at the adjacent one, they probably are not allowed to look at Igor&#8217;s optimization and copy it.</p>
<p>Now, if we only could co-operate with them for real then I wouldn&#8217;t be speculating about this in the first place&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Day</title>
		<link>http://dom.as/2010/07/30/on-primary-keys/#comment-1763</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Day]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mituzas.lt/?p=774#comment-1763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Domas, I&#039;ve filed &lt;a href=&quot;http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=55656&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bug #55656&lt;/a&gt; on this. Please provide feedback there, particularly about the suggested fix.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Domas, I&#8217;ve filed <a href="http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=55656" rel="nofollow">bug #55656</a> on this. Please provide feedback there, particularly about the suggested fix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart Smith</title>
		<link>http://dom.as/2010/07/30/on-primary-keys/#comment-1762</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stewart Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mituzas.lt/?p=774#comment-1762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, if disk seeks were free... it *might* be better....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, if disk seeks were free&#8230; it *might* be better&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Igor Babaev</title>
		<link>http://dom.as/2010/07/30/on-primary-keys/#comment-1761</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Igor Babaev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mituzas.lt/?p=774#comment-1761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To be exact: we did not have it reverted in our releases: the patch  for #39653 was not accepted  after my review and was removed from our internal merge tree. So MariaDB never contained this patch in any release tree.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be exact: we did not have it reverted in our releases: the patch  for #39653 was not accepted  after my review and was removed from our internal merge tree. So MariaDB never contained this patch in any release tree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

